Comment by arghwhat
6 months ago
I think you're confusing suppresing the fire and extinguishing it. You are not trying to stop battery cells that are currently on fire from burning - you will just have to wait for those to be out of fuel. The purpose of fire suppression is to stop new things from heating up by the fire past the point of combustion, catching fire and thereby spreading it - be it more battery cells, construction materials, you name it.
Modern EV fire suppression systems for parking garages use high pressure water mists to contain the fire to a single vechicle for example. This keeps neighboring cars cool and avoids them catching fire, and cooling down the burning vehicle may avoid spread to more battery banks or other flammable materials.
> Modern EV fire suppression systems for parking garages use high pressure water mists to contain the fire to a single vechicle for example.
Indeed but look at the size of the pipes and the pressure they're operating at. Far above the typical residential, what, three bars that come from the utility. The volume of water is the key.
Your home residential battery is not an entire parking garage full of EVs, so looking at their pipes and pressures is not relevant.
Those pipes are dimensioned to be able to suppress fire in every parking booth of an entire parking garage full of EVs, each of which packing more of a punch than most residential battery installations. While it cannot handle every car being on fire, it needs to handle any car being on fire when it goes off.
This is orders of magnitude more powerful than what you need for a small residential setup. Have a professional evaluate what system is best - if they suggest a sprinkler system, which they might, I am sure they would understand the capacity of your residential water supply and suggest upgrades (new piping to mains or buffer tanks) as needed.
Fair point. The problem is, the cost for such a consultation will run into the five figures, that's more than even a brand new battery pack setup from a reputable brand costs.
2 replies →