Comment by madaxe_again

1 day ago

They say “the only US alternative”, which is true, but it’s not the only alternative - nasa paid for seats on Soyuz for many years, and I’m sure they could go back to doing the same. Perhaps China would be willing to sell seats on their launches. Maybe India will be in a position to offer human launches to the U.S. fairly soon - should be up and running by 2027, and they seem to hit their objectives most of the time.

Cooperation with roscosmos seems to have been largely unimpeded by Russia’s political and military actions over the years, so these all seem like realistic possibilities.

Yes, it will be a shame if the U.S. has no launch capability of their own, but short term partisan political thinking is much more important to the electorate than long term national strategic interest.

NASA still cooperates heavily with Roscosmos and American astronauts regularly fly in paid Soyuz seats. The latest one is Johnny Kim who launched in late April on Soyuz MS-27 from Baikonur and will stay on the ISS until december. And Christopher Williams is already scheduled for the next Soyuz mission.

China on the other hand will probably never happen because of the general political climate in the US and this administration in particular.

>nasa paid for seats on Soyuz for many years, and I’m sure they could go back to doing the same

No. Obviously not.

>Perhaps China would be willing to sell seats on their launches.

That would be an extreme humiliation of the US and NASA. Abandoning civil space programs entirely would be preferable.

>Maybe India will be in a position to offer human launches to the U.S. fairly soon - should be up and running by 2027, and they seem to hit their objectives most of the time.

India is nowhere close to the capabilities of the US, China or Russia.