Comment by antisol
8 months ago
Wow, someone has really been chugging on that kool-aid.
> The problem with "X works" type arguments is that, no, no it doesn't, not generally
So, to summarise: what you're saying, in a thread where I demonstrated and you yourself said that X "just works", is that suddenly it doesn't now.
Well I'll be sure to tell my laptop, it's got this thing where it's super stable for weeks at a time. Maybe my laptop hearing that actually it's DE doesn't work and that I imagined all those times I hotplugged my projector is what is needed to magically make wayland usable in the real world.
---
Bwahahahahaha!
So I did about 5 minutes of searching, and found: https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/Wayland/NVIDIA
Accelerated Xwayland clients (GLX)
There is currently no accelerated GLX support when running a GNOME Wayland session no top of the NVIDIA drivers, meaning X11 OpenGL applications will use software rendering.
and:
Mode setting
Mode setting is possible, but the current requirement to use dumb buffers during mode setting before establishing the EGLSurface, EGLDevice CRTC stream link, results in memory constraint issues with multiple monitors with higher resolutions.
Monitor mirroring
Monitor mirroring is currently not possible due to the issue that an EGLSurface can only be linked to a single CRTC. The way GNOME Shell currently does monitor mirroring relies on passing the same hardware buffer to multiple CRTCs, which is currently not supported by the API exposed by the NVIDIA driver.
...Which is just a hilarious, hilarious joke. So in other words, wayland is a complete non-starter for any serious use. But I suppose, to be fair, you won't have to worry about that issue you claim is with X where you say you need to reboot to plug in a second monitor: you just can't have a second monitor! Not if you want it mirrored, or at "higher resolutions"
Hey, just for fun: I bet you can't guess which windowing system has supported all these things for decades?
One more fun one, from: https://www.xfce.org/about/tour420
"Plans are underway to add Wayland support to Xfwm4 while preserving its existing X11 functionality. However, such a restructurization will be a major effort and we cannot tell yet when/if it will be done, so please don't hold your breath waiting for it."
Lol, yep, it's X that doesn't "just work", hahahahaha.
(and no, I wouldn't be holding my breath, would I, given that wayland has now been in development longer than Duke Nukem Forever)
I think we're about done here.
> If nobody wants to maintain it
Everything you listed has worked for years and the site is outdated, it even mentions as such.
> This site has been retired. For up to date information, see handbook.gnome.org or gitlab.gnome.org.
If you're going to link from a site, try read it first.
At this point I think you're just arguing in bad faith and you have some strange ideological reasons to cling to X.
As I've already said, if this maintenance effort works out, then great! You, and maybe some other's, can continue to use X and the world will be happy.
I doubt that's going to be the case, but I do actually wish you the best of luck.
Debates, especially on highly subjective issues, will not always be resolved quickly and definitively in the absence of bad faith. That "ideological reasons" you're sensing is the worldview of the person you're talking to.
Sure, ok.
> some strange ideological reasons to cling to X.
"It works" == "strange ideological reasons"
...And you claim I'm the one arguing in bad faith, lol.
You might want to look up "projection".
> I do actually wish you the best of luck.
Yep, and good luck - sincerely - getting wayland to a usable state. Who knows, maybe in another decade or two it'll be worth revisiting
Wayland works great for me and is significantly more stable and feature-rich, so I'm not waiting for anything. I'm doing things right now that are probably never going to be possible on X just because of the legacy of X.
Obviously, our priorities are different, and probably our hardware too. Maybe I'm lucky, maybe you're horribly unlucky, I don't know. But I will continue to enjoy my higher DPI displays, and HDR, and thunderbolt :p
5 replies →
now do HDR