Comment by madaxe_again
13 hours ago
I see a European measuring skulls. I suppose you think yourself Aryan.
Christ, you could make the same argument about the U.K. - the aristocratic classes tend to have more Norman blood. Are they a superior race?
13 hours ago
I see a European measuring skulls. I suppose you think yourself Aryan.
Christ, you could make the same argument about the U.K. - the aristocratic classes tend to have more Norman blood. Are they a superior race?
> I see a European measuring skulls.
That will be news to Razib. You could more accurately describe him as "Aryan".
> Christ, you could make the same argument about the U.K. - the aristocratic classes tend to have more Norman blood.
Well, on the assumption that it's extremely easy to distinguish the British aristocracy from the peasantry by a blood test - what would that do to support the idea that people frequently switch between the categories?
> Are they a superior race?
Hm. Perhaps you yourself should be more concerned with facts? Are you saying that the Tutsis and the Hutus aren't different because you think that's true, or because you think it's important for people to believe it whether or not it's true?
Suppose that the Tutsis and the Hutus were longstanding ethnic groups both basically closed to outsiders, such as the other group. What would that look like?