a) noone looks at the code
b) they make random user-facing changes
c) random churn that makes the code better (preferably with as few user-facing modifications as possible)
IMO the best option is c). Guy is literally doing the single best thing possible.
Yeah dumping a bunch of commits that do nothing might be considered "active" by some people. I wouldn't consider it active.
What are the options?
IMO the best option is c). Guy is literally doing the single best thing possible.
Better than current Xorg activity ;) (which is very low)
Eh, I don't know. There's an argument to be made that no changes is preferable to breaking changes with little or no benefit.