Comment by okanat

7 days ago

> You say this, but then proceed to state that it had a very good design back then informed by research, and still is today. Doesn't that qualify? :-)

I meant that NT was a product that matched the state of the art OS design of its time (90s). It was the Unix world that decided to be behind in 80s forever.

NT was ahead not because it is breaking ground and bringing in new design aspects of 2020s to wider audiences but Unix world constantly decides to be hardcore conservative and backwards in OS design. They just accept that a PDP11 simulator is all you need.

It is similar to how NASA got stuck with 70s/80s design of Shuttle. There was research for newer launch systems but nobody made good engineering applications of them.

Unix 'died' with plan9/9front, which is far more advanced than Unix v7 for a PDP or a DEC, can't remember.

9front is to Unix was NT it's for VMS.