Comment by kreetx 1 day ago He is in nowhere like prison. 4 comments kreetx Reply sorcerer-mar 1 day ago So? Your logic applies to prison just the same, obviously. kreetx 20 hours ago Being in prison and being free in your home country sound pretty different to me, in terms of free speech, or free anything really. sorcerer-mar 19 hours ago They're no different on the dimension that you identified as relevant: is he able to express himself or not?I mean, you could put someone in solitary confinement and he'd be "able to express himself."It's almost as if your heuristic is a bad one, which is why it is not the one established in the US Constitution or 250 years of case law. 1 reply →
sorcerer-mar 1 day ago So? Your logic applies to prison just the same, obviously. kreetx 20 hours ago Being in prison and being free in your home country sound pretty different to me, in terms of free speech, or free anything really. sorcerer-mar 19 hours ago They're no different on the dimension that you identified as relevant: is he able to express himself or not?I mean, you could put someone in solitary confinement and he'd be "able to express himself."It's almost as if your heuristic is a bad one, which is why it is not the one established in the US Constitution or 250 years of case law. 1 reply →
kreetx 20 hours ago Being in prison and being free in your home country sound pretty different to me, in terms of free speech, or free anything really. sorcerer-mar 19 hours ago They're no different on the dimension that you identified as relevant: is he able to express himself or not?I mean, you could put someone in solitary confinement and he'd be "able to express himself."It's almost as if your heuristic is a bad one, which is why it is not the one established in the US Constitution or 250 years of case law. 1 reply →
sorcerer-mar 19 hours ago They're no different on the dimension that you identified as relevant: is he able to express himself or not?I mean, you could put someone in solitary confinement and he'd be "able to express himself."It's almost as if your heuristic is a bad one, which is why it is not the one established in the US Constitution or 250 years of case law. 1 reply →
So? Your logic applies to prison just the same, obviously.
Being in prison and being free in your home country sound pretty different to me, in terms of free speech, or free anything really.
They're no different on the dimension that you identified as relevant: is he able to express himself or not?
I mean, you could put someone in solitary confinement and he'd be "able to express himself."
It's almost as if your heuristic is a bad one, which is why it is not the one established in the US Constitution or 250 years of case law.
1 reply →