It it an actuality and not a not a technicality. The reasons remain the same as the last time you made the assertion. Also for the next time.
You've been heading toward the farthest boundary of good faith discussion for some time now. At this point, I think you are signaling that you have crossed it.
> Had he been denied entry at point of departure, would that have been ok?
You are asking how I'd feel if a foreign government took some action against him at their border?
This question is fairly far afield; it would be a wholly different discussion.
So it does seem to me that this this person should be in the US due to a technicality?
It it an actuality and not a not a technicality. The reasons remain the same as the last time you made the assertion. Also for the next time.
You've been heading toward the farthest boundary of good faith discussion for some time now. At this point, I think you are signaling that you have crossed it.
1 reply →