Comment by lofaszvanitt 1 day ago What no? Why can't we have nice things, like concise, easy to remember, not overly elaborate syntax? 15 comments lofaszvanitt Reply ameliaquining 1 day ago jQuery is large and contains a lot of things. Which specific features do you think the DOM needs? eszed 1 day ago From bevr1337's comment, above:> its API was a reflection of the domain. As a developer, I want to query for a node (CSS selector, xpath, etc.) to affect change and traverse to other nodesThat's what I miss about it. jraph 17 hours ago Doesn't querySelector(All) provide this? 11 replies → lofaszvanitt 17 hours ago What do you think is alrite in the current spec?
ameliaquining 1 day ago jQuery is large and contains a lot of things. Which specific features do you think the DOM needs? eszed 1 day ago From bevr1337's comment, above:> its API was a reflection of the domain. As a developer, I want to query for a node (CSS selector, xpath, etc.) to affect change and traverse to other nodesThat's what I miss about it. jraph 17 hours ago Doesn't querySelector(All) provide this? 11 replies → lofaszvanitt 17 hours ago What do you think is alrite in the current spec?
eszed 1 day ago From bevr1337's comment, above:> its API was a reflection of the domain. As a developer, I want to query for a node (CSS selector, xpath, etc.) to affect change and traverse to other nodesThat's what I miss about it. jraph 17 hours ago Doesn't querySelector(All) provide this? 11 replies →
jQuery is large and contains a lot of things. Which specific features do you think the DOM needs?
From bevr1337's comment, above:
> its API was a reflection of the domain. As a developer, I want to query for a node (CSS selector, xpath, etc.) to affect change and traverse to other nodes
That's what I miss about it.
Doesn't querySelector(All) provide this?
11 replies →
What do you think is alrite in the current spec?