Comment by chickenzzzzu 7 months ago [flagged] 9 comments chickenzzzzu Reply happymellon 7 months ago How is forcing manufacturers to state that they are planning to bork your game in the future "increasing the barrier of entry"? chickenzzzzu 7 months ago If the only thing that this initiative seeks to achieve is clear and fair labeling when purchasing something, I'm all for it.If in the future, if anyone (including this initiative) requires the release or maintenance of server builds or code, I am against it. skotobaza 7 months ago > if anyone (including this initiative) requires the release or maintenance of server builds or code, I am against itWhy? What do you personally lose because of that? 6 replies →
happymellon 7 months ago How is forcing manufacturers to state that they are planning to bork your game in the future "increasing the barrier of entry"? chickenzzzzu 7 months ago If the only thing that this initiative seeks to achieve is clear and fair labeling when purchasing something, I'm all for it.If in the future, if anyone (including this initiative) requires the release or maintenance of server builds or code, I am against it. skotobaza 7 months ago > if anyone (including this initiative) requires the release or maintenance of server builds or code, I am against itWhy? What do you personally lose because of that? 6 replies →
chickenzzzzu 7 months ago If the only thing that this initiative seeks to achieve is clear and fair labeling when purchasing something, I'm all for it.If in the future, if anyone (including this initiative) requires the release or maintenance of server builds or code, I am against it. skotobaza 7 months ago > if anyone (including this initiative) requires the release or maintenance of server builds or code, I am against itWhy? What do you personally lose because of that? 6 replies →
skotobaza 7 months ago > if anyone (including this initiative) requires the release or maintenance of server builds or code, I am against itWhy? What do you personally lose because of that? 6 replies →
How is forcing manufacturers to state that they are planning to bork your game in the future "increasing the barrier of entry"?
If the only thing that this initiative seeks to achieve is clear and fair labeling when purchasing something, I'm all for it.
If in the future, if anyone (including this initiative) requires the release or maintenance of server builds or code, I am against it.
> if anyone (including this initiative) requires the release or maintenance of server builds or code, I am against it
Why? What do you personally lose because of that?
6 replies →