Comment by BolexNOLA
5 days ago
That request is a trap and can’t be satisfied. Any answer can be hand waved away with ease. It’s vague yet restrictive.
5 days ago
That request is a trap and can’t be satisfied. Any answer can be hand waved away with ease. It’s vague yet restrictive.
If that request is a trap then you have basically made my point for me I guess.
If you believe the judges are all being as objective as possible and that the systemic flaws in our judicial system are not being exploited by the Trump admin/lawyers representing the Trump admin without pushback from said judges than you can’t be convinced by me. I can cite an example, and if you aren’t personally convinced you can simply say “the court of law said x was innocent or y was held liable” or whatever you consider the correct arbiter.
You can appeal to the system that I am actively saying is not working but you get the benefit of “well the law/eatablishment says so.” You can lean on your opinion or the results, whichever serves you better, in a way I can’t as you cite the case itself. The entire discussion is poisoned out the gate.
Is your entire position that government doesn't work so we should get rid of it? Or do you have proposals for actual ways to improve it?
3 replies →