Comment by thayne

3 days ago

I don't think she is entirely to blame, but I think there is some blame for not standing up to Musk and leading better.

> I think there is some blame for not standing up to Musk and leading better.

That seems in the same category as saying there's some blame on her for not working harder on basketball in her youth and so never becoming a WNBA Finals MVP. (Narrator: Um, no, she's not nearly tall enough ....)

  • I'm just not sure her complete lack of power to stand up to Musk is a defense. If a controversial rich guy offers you a CEO job that consists entirely of laundering his reputation by pretending his decisions are your own, you have a social responsibility not to take it. I'd be more sympathetic if she were some random person who couldn't otherwise dream of an executive level pay package, but she was the head of ads at NBC.

    • > If a controversial rich guy offers you a CEO job that consists entirely of laundering his reputation by pretending his decisions are your own, you have a social responsibility not to take it.

      I don't think you become the CEO of any major company by believing that "social responsibility" exists. Doesn't the job pretty much select for the type of person who thinks the world owes them $20+ million a year?

      With that said - it's dumb to blame the puppet for the acts of the ventriloquist.

      4 replies →

    • > a social responsibility not to take it

      She was paid $6M a year + undisclosed stock package. A lot of people will set aside their morals for this amount of money.

      1 reply →

    • “We have established what you are, madam. We are now merely haggling over the price.”

  • I mean, you are hired as a CEO by Elon Musk, there must be some certain expectations on the capabilities of a CEO, and I think one of the first one is being able to stand up for yourself, if nothing else.