I think if something can be done as an extension then there is no need to do it as a fork of the existing software.
Are there any differences b/w nanobrowser and brwoserOS? like some functionalities that only browserOS could do and not nanobrowser which are worth mentioning?
From a quick scan of the page, they seems to use some kind external LLM API keys. The appear of the poster project seems to be locally run LLM (assuming tranfomer.js ).
Hm just saw this.
I think if something can be done as an extension then there is no need to do it as a fork of the existing software.
Are there any differences b/w nanobrowser and brwoserOS? like some functionalities that only browserOS could do and not nanobrowser which are worth mentioning?
From a quick scan of the page, they seems to use some kind external LLM API keys. The appear of the poster project seems to be locally run LLM (assuming tranfomer.js ).
thanks for the mention!