I still love when Putin just drops his Kompromot on Tucker right on his head during the interview. "We know you tried to join the CIA and we know they wouldn't take you :)"
I am convinced that the whole 'sexual abuse' thing is very common in upper echelons and make for a convenient excuse to take down someone now towing the line.
I almost always look for 'root cause' when I hear a sexual abuse scandle taking down someone in power.
I wish people would shut up about it. It's gotten to the point where normal peers can hardly even talk about sex without being afraid of getting in trouble.
Flirting with coworkers is fine, natural even. Calm down or become a shut in and leave the rest of us alone.
Carlson is essentially a performer. He has publicly said so many contradictory things I'm not sure why it matters what he thinks at any given point in time.
Did he say something different after the $787 million judgement? Because the whole reason that judgement came down is because Murdoch was fine with what Carlson was saying.
Thus proving the point. The moment he went against the talking points he got fired.
He was kicked off for being a sex pest and knowingly pushing the election lies internally at Fox News.
I still love when Putin just drops his Kompromot on Tucker right on his head during the interview. "We know you tried to join the CIA and we know they wouldn't take you :)"
I wonder if there is a timeline where Tucker responds, "Actually, they did" and then assassinates Putin with his bare hands.
I am convinced that the whole 'sexual abuse' thing is very common in upper echelons and make for a convenient excuse to take down someone now towing the line.
I almost always look for 'root cause' when I hear a sexual abuse scandle taking down someone in power.
I wish people would shut up about it. It's gotten to the point where normal peers can hardly even talk about sex without being afraid of getting in trouble.
Flirting with coworkers is fine, natural even. Calm down or become a shut in and leave the rest of us alone.
2 replies →
Carlson is essentially a performer. He has publicly said so many contradictory things I'm not sure why it matters what he thinks at any given point in time.
He’s changed opinions over time and admitted it, but been consistent for the last handful of years.
I'm not sure what you're trying to defend, but if you are asking me to admit that tucker carlson is consistent, you'll have to wait a few decades.
2 replies →
There was the $787M lawsuit settlement Fox agreed to because of Carlson's content. That probably had a bit more to do with it.
The Dominion lawsuit was Hannity [1] not Carlson.
Carlson is much smarter and lets his guests actually make wild accusations while Carlson is "just asking questions".
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_Hannity#2020_election
You said Carlson twice.
1 reply →
It's kind of part of the same thing. He said stuff Murdoch didn't like so he was gone. Whether he believed it or not is hard to tell.
No, he finally said something that cost Murdoch money instead of making him money.
1 reply →
Part of the lawsuit is that he and the other Fox hosts were texting each other and mocking the lies they were saying on air as obvious nonsense.
Did he say something different after the $787 million judgement? Because the whole reason that judgement came down is because Murdoch was fine with what Carlson was saying.