Comment by williamdclt 7 months ago What do you mean by this? What authz would you expect/like? 3 comments williamdclt Reply cryptonector 7 months ago I'd like to say that only some roles can NOTIFY to some channels. Similarly for alternatives to LISTEN/NOTIFY. williamdclt 7 months ago Right. It’s not something I’ve had to handle, I’ve always worked in environments where db clients are well behaved and under my control, what’s your use case out of interest? cryptonector 7 months ago Security in depth. If I have to give someone login access, I should be able to control what they do.
cryptonector 7 months ago I'd like to say that only some roles can NOTIFY to some channels. Similarly for alternatives to LISTEN/NOTIFY. williamdclt 7 months ago Right. It’s not something I’ve had to handle, I’ve always worked in environments where db clients are well behaved and under my control, what’s your use case out of interest? cryptonector 7 months ago Security in depth. If I have to give someone login access, I should be able to control what they do.
williamdclt 7 months ago Right. It’s not something I’ve had to handle, I’ve always worked in environments where db clients are well behaved and under my control, what’s your use case out of interest? cryptonector 7 months ago Security in depth. If I have to give someone login access, I should be able to control what they do.
cryptonector 7 months ago Security in depth. If I have to give someone login access, I should be able to control what they do.
I'd like to say that only some roles can NOTIFY to some channels. Similarly for alternatives to LISTEN/NOTIFY.
Right. It’s not something I’ve had to handle, I’ve always worked in environments where db clients are well behaved and under my control, what’s your use case out of interest?
Security in depth. If I have to give someone login access, I should be able to control what they do.