Comment by delusional

20 days ago

And then you feel comfortable guaranteeing that it could never be abused?

The issue is being brought up by the state auditor. This article is literally what would happen anyway if your pet policy was enacted. The police would ignore your little policy, and the standard would have to write an article about the abuse. Hopefully that article would drive public opinion enough for change to happen.

This is the system working.

5 comments

delusional

Reply
JumpCrisscross  20 days ago

> police would ignore your little policy

Sorry, I meant to make it technically impossible to query the data without producing a public log.

  • apwell23  20 days ago

    thats how it is now though ?

      As part of a Flock search, police have to provide a “reason” they are performing the lookup. In the “reason” field for searches of Danville’s cameras, officers from across the U.S. wrote “immigration,” “ICE,” “ICE+ERO,”