Comment by rglullis
4 months ago
Even worse! This makes the whole proposal even more misguided.
Different ecosystems only make sense when we have distinct populations that might be as well considered different species.
4 months ago
Even worse! This makes the whole proposal even more misguided.
Different ecosystems only make sense when we have distinct populations that might be as well considered different species.
There's no 'proposal' here -- this is a review of an active ecosystem that has already had its ideas implemented and iterated on for the past six years.
Having a different ecosystem is the exact intention of this project. If that's not for you, you're certainly not required to participate, but the world is a vast continuum of variation, and is full of niches and clines that are intentionally distant from the global mean. Complaining that non-mainstream stuff exists seems pretty nuts to me -- the world is full of 'distinct populations'.
> a vast continuum of variation, and is full of niches and clines that are intentionally distant from the global mean.
But they are all sharing the same world. It's all the same ecosystem.
My objection is not because I am against people trying to do something different. My objection is to this delusional idea that this work needs to be isolated from everyone else. It's sterile at best and elitist at worst.
Its a protocol. A means of communication. It can't be isolated, by definition. There's plenty of cross-platform things using it.
It is as elitest and isolationist as RSS - another limited system.
The format is limited, to preserve the user agent's ability to act... As a user's agent, rather than the host. That's it.
Your objection seems to be... People walking a path you wouldn't.
3 replies →