Comment by whimsicalism 2 days ago Likely the same way visual artists ensure that they only learn from images with permissive licenses. 5 comments whimsicalism Reply codedokode 2 days ago Human learning and computer processing millions of works are different things. I don't think any human artists have seen as many images as the developers used for training. 0x457 1 day ago Only if you don't count artists with able eye(s) living their life? renewiltord 2 days ago Then let he who hath not sinned cast the first stone. jamespo 2 days ago Yes scale is totally irrelevant, that's what all of FAANG tell us too :/ 1 reply →
codedokode 2 days ago Human learning and computer processing millions of works are different things. I don't think any human artists have seen as many images as the developers used for training. 0x457 1 day ago Only if you don't count artists with able eye(s) living their life? renewiltord 2 days ago Then let he who hath not sinned cast the first stone. jamespo 2 days ago Yes scale is totally irrelevant, that's what all of FAANG tell us too :/ 1 reply →
renewiltord 2 days ago Then let he who hath not sinned cast the first stone. jamespo 2 days ago Yes scale is totally irrelevant, that's what all of FAANG tell us too :/ 1 reply →
jamespo 2 days ago Yes scale is totally irrelevant, that's what all of FAANG tell us too :/ 1 reply →
Human learning and computer processing millions of works are different things. I don't think any human artists have seen as many images as the developers used for training.
Only if you don't count artists with able eye(s) living their life?
Then let he who hath not sinned cast the first stone.
Yes scale is totally irrelevant, that's what all of FAANG tell us too :/
1 reply →