Comment by Etheryte
1 day ago
The title doesn't say nor imply anything about her getting it back though? It says her assets were seized which is correct.
1 day ago
The title doesn't say nor imply anything about her getting it back though? It says her assets were seized which is correct.
The article itself has the title:
> The FBI Seized Her $40,000 Without Explaining Why. She Fought Back Against That Practice—and Lost
I think it's decent, but still a bit ambiguous. Less ambiguous than if it just said "She Fought Back and Lost". My initial assumption formed by the title was still that she didn't get her money back.
The submission title is "FBI seized $40k from Linda Martin without charging her with a crime" which doesn't have that issue.
It was not that originally.