Comment by connicpu

16 hours ago

Great, scooters are much less likely to kill pedestrians during collisions. I'm glad more people who didn't actually need 2 ton metal boxes are downsizing to something more practical.

Great, now I'll have the 0.02% chance of surviving a collision with a scooter that slaloms on any possible walkable terrain, instead of a 0.01% chance of surviving a collision with a car that won't hit me because they don't drive on sidewalks.

[flagged]

  • yes, famously no society has ever managed to have children without widespread private car ownership.

  • This has to be the most American comment ever.

    Society will collapse no less due to minor inconveniences!!

  • Ah yes, because mowing down kids is somehow pro family?

    I live car free in a Dutch suburb with two small kids and do so specifically so our kids could have a better life than crappy American suburbia.

  • > Make it hard for people to have families and society will collapse

    I used to live in Amsterdam which has a great public transport, great cycling paths, and limits of 30km/h. People are going cycling to school, on dates, and picnic with their families. Associating having a 3 ton gas guzzler as a prerequisite of having a family and a roadblock of "society" is only a question of poor imagination.

    https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/six-health-lessons-learn-net...

    There are multiple reasons Americans are obese as hell and living shorter than us Europeans, and driving everywhere is one of it.

    • Some areas such as Amsterdam though are just naturally more ammenable to walking, cycling, and transit. Cycling in 90+ (F) temperatures with high humidity (very common in the summer in the US midwest or south), or even just walking very far or waiting very long for a bus is pretty miserable. I'd arrive at my destination literally dripping with sweat and really unpresentable.

      4 replies →

  • Yes. There were no families before carriages… /s

    A carless society/city is way more family-oriented.