Comment by rsynnott

6 months ago

I mean, this is the religion/philosophy which produced Roko's Basilisk (and not one of their weird offshoot murder-cults, either, it showed up on LessWrong, and was taken at least somewhat seriously by people there, to the point that Yudkowsky censored it. Their beliefs about AI are... out there.

> and was taken at least somewhat seriously by people there, to the point that Yudkowsky censored it.

Roko isn't taken seriously. What was taken seriously is ~ "if you've had an idea that you yourself think will harm people to even know about it, don't share it".

  • But if you think that knowing about the basilisk is harmful to people who don't know about it, surely you are taking it at least somewhat seriously?

    • Not necessarily, it also comes from taking your users seriously before you even know what they were saying.

      Consider: If you trust the people on your forum to be sensible, and one day one of your users writes:

        "I have realised something which is dangerous to know. Here it is: …"
      

      then the sensible choice is to (1) stop reading immediately, don't even find out what's after the ellipsis, (2) delete/hide/otherwise remove their message, and (3) put in a general statement of "don't write things that you think are dangerous for people to know".