Comment by Sent1n3l

2 days ago

[flagged]

A shitton of people, not to mention including all F-Droid users, would take FOSS ideology over new fangled bloated "non-decrepit" development tools _any day_.

But in any case, this is false dichotomy, and likely exaggerated one to begin with.

I think it's extremely useful to have more strict requirements on how programs are built, to make sure that developers don't do stupid things that makes code harder for others to compile.

The tools in question in OP should be easy to build from source and not rely on the host's architecture, to be usable on platforms like ARM and RISCV. It's clear that in the android ecosystem, people don't care, so F-Droid can't do miracles (the java/gradle ecosystem is just really bad at this), but this would not happen if the build tools had proper build recipes themselves.

As a user, i'm glad when devs use old tools so that my battery has a chance of lasting the whole day and my apps don't take 10 seconds just to open.

  • > As a user, i'm glad when devs use old tools so that my battery has a chance of lasting the whole day and my apps don't take 10 seconds just to open.

    Yup, same here! The story is as old as time, and the examples are plentiful. First Slashdot, then Reddit, then now GitHub, all became far-far-far slower and less usable, once they've been "improved" by the folk engaging in the resume-driven development:

    Why is GitHub UI getting slower? - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44799861 - Aug 2025 (115 comments)

    I am, too, as a user, quite pleased that F-Droid is keeping it cool and reliable for the actual users.

    • On github besides the slowness the number of clicks is increasing! I now have to click a "..." thing that opens a menu that only has 1 item in it to see the test build. And of course that (proprietary) tool follows the trend so I need another number of clicks to finally get to the logs and see what failed.