Comment by potato3732842
5 hours ago
Were they really reasonable and well intentioned if they were written with these faults and people supported them as such?
5 hours ago
Were they really reasonable and well intentioned if they were written with these faults and people supported them as such?
California's notorious CEQA was originally intended only to apply to public projects, but the State Supreme Court bizarrely decided to interpret it to as written cover pretty much any construction, public or private, presumably plugging their ears and singing when the legislature attempted to clarify that that was never the intent of the law.
Course have subsequently expanded it's purview beyond parody, such that a law that was written with the goal of preventing contaminated rivers from catching fire now requires a housing developer to study the potential "environmental impact" college students getting a bit too noisy would have on the surrounding neighborhood.
Likely they were side effects that nobody thought of until people started using them after the regulations were created.