Comment by vFunct

5 days ago

The limited self-driving cars, with a remote human operator? no, I never have.

This rather underplays the experience of riding a Waymo. Where it works, it works: you get in and it takes you to the place, no human intervention required at any point.

By analogy, the first hands-off coding agents may be like that: they may not work for everything, but where they do, they could work without human intervention.

  • "where it works, it works" by that metric we already have agents which don't need any guidance to program

    • I'd say they're closer to 2010s self-driving cars; they still need frequent human intervention, even when on the happy path, to make sure they don't make a mess of things.

This is a rather dismissive response considering the progress they’ve made over the past few years. The other commenter is correct that they use highly detailed maps but you are incorrect as they do not have a remote human operator.

I find them more enjoyable than Uber. They’ve already surpassed Lyft in SF ridership and soon they will take the crown from Uber.