Comment by tovej

This seems like nonsense to me. The results are clearly incoherent, both the text generation and punctuation.

Seems like the idea is to sample words at fibonacci intervals and use those for generating new text. Obviously these word will be roughly related. If the author is really just Monte Carlo generating words based on these frequency tables then you would obviously get roughly related words as output, but with worse coherence, due to the fibonacci gaps. The author also doesn't seem to have any clue about what is happening or any way of evaluating the results.

There is also no code? Why did this make the front page?