Comment by jonathan920 1 day ago Oh no , Rust is too tough, go is no good, am i going back to java? 5 comments jonathan920 Reply maxloh 1 day ago Maybe the new in-development Carbon language? It sounds promising, but it is nowhere near its 1.0 release. masklinn 1 day ago Carbon exists only for interoperating with and transitioning off of C++. Creating a new code base in carbon doesn’t really make sense, and the project’s readme literally tells you not to do that. maxloh 1 day ago > ... and the project’s readme literally tells you not to do that.Could you quote which paragraph you're talking about?AFAIK, interoperability with C++ code is just one of their explicit goals; they only place that as the last item in the "Language Goals" section. 1 reply → pjmlp 1 day ago So many options in-between.
maxloh 1 day ago Maybe the new in-development Carbon language? It sounds promising, but it is nowhere near its 1.0 release. masklinn 1 day ago Carbon exists only for interoperating with and transitioning off of C++. Creating a new code base in carbon doesn’t really make sense, and the project’s readme literally tells you not to do that. maxloh 1 day ago > ... and the project’s readme literally tells you not to do that.Could you quote which paragraph you're talking about?AFAIK, interoperability with C++ code is just one of their explicit goals; they only place that as the last item in the "Language Goals" section. 1 reply →
masklinn 1 day ago Carbon exists only for interoperating with and transitioning off of C++. Creating a new code base in carbon doesn’t really make sense, and the project’s readme literally tells you not to do that. maxloh 1 day ago > ... and the project’s readme literally tells you not to do that.Could you quote which paragraph you're talking about?AFAIK, interoperability with C++ code is just one of their explicit goals; they only place that as the last item in the "Language Goals" section. 1 reply →
maxloh 1 day ago > ... and the project’s readme literally tells you not to do that.Could you quote which paragraph you're talking about?AFAIK, interoperability with C++ code is just one of their explicit goals; they only place that as the last item in the "Language Goals" section. 1 reply →
Maybe the new in-development Carbon language? It sounds promising, but it is nowhere near its 1.0 release.
Carbon exists only for interoperating with and transitioning off of C++. Creating a new code base in carbon doesn’t really make sense, and the project’s readme literally tells you not to do that.
> ... and the project’s readme literally tells you not to do that.
Could you quote which paragraph you're talking about?
AFAIK, interoperability with C++ code is just one of their explicit goals; they only place that as the last item in the "Language Goals" section.
1 reply →
So many options in-between.