Comment by bongodongobob 5 months ago I'd rather the citizens control the companies than the other way around. 7 comments bongodongobob Reply fach 5 months ago Branding nationalizing companies as “citizens control” is quite the spin. Chinese citizens surely own the means of production, right? harimau777 5 months ago I suppose that depends on whether said country is a democracy where citizens control the government or a dictatorship where they do not. bongodongobob 5 months ago Nationalizing a company isn't communism and isn't intended to resemble it. sanex 5 months ago How is that not common/collective control of the means of production? 2 replies → yunohn 5 months ago Indeed, it’s actually a horrific non-communist pro-capitalist version that leaves citizens much worse off - see “bailout socialism for the rich and rugged individualism for masses”.
fach 5 months ago Branding nationalizing companies as “citizens control” is quite the spin. Chinese citizens surely own the means of production, right? harimau777 5 months ago I suppose that depends on whether said country is a democracy where citizens control the government or a dictatorship where they do not. bongodongobob 5 months ago Nationalizing a company isn't communism and isn't intended to resemble it. sanex 5 months ago How is that not common/collective control of the means of production? 2 replies → yunohn 5 months ago Indeed, it’s actually a horrific non-communist pro-capitalist version that leaves citizens much worse off - see “bailout socialism for the rich and rugged individualism for masses”.
harimau777 5 months ago I suppose that depends on whether said country is a democracy where citizens control the government or a dictatorship where they do not.
bongodongobob 5 months ago Nationalizing a company isn't communism and isn't intended to resemble it. sanex 5 months ago How is that not common/collective control of the means of production? 2 replies → yunohn 5 months ago Indeed, it’s actually a horrific non-communist pro-capitalist version that leaves citizens much worse off - see “bailout socialism for the rich and rugged individualism for masses”.
yunohn 5 months ago Indeed, it’s actually a horrific non-communist pro-capitalist version that leaves citizens much worse off - see “bailout socialism for the rich and rugged individualism for masses”.
Branding nationalizing companies as “citizens control” is quite the spin. Chinese citizens surely own the means of production, right?
I suppose that depends on whether said country is a democracy where citizens control the government or a dictatorship where they do not.
Nationalizing a company isn't communism and isn't intended to resemble it.
How is that not common/collective control of the means of production?
2 replies →
Indeed, it’s actually a horrific non-communist pro-capitalist version that leaves citizens much worse off - see “bailout socialism for the rich and rugged individualism for masses”.