← Back to context Comment by bongodongobob 16 hours ago I'd rather the citizens control the companies than the other way around. 7 comments bongodongobob Reply fach 15 hours ago Branding nationalizing companies as “citizens control” is quite the spin. Chinese citizens surely own the means of production, right? harimau777 14 hours ago I suppose that depends on whether said country is a democracy where citizens control the government or a dictatorship where they do not. bongodongobob 15 hours ago Nationalizing a company isn't communism and isn't intended to resemble it. sanex 15 hours ago How is that not common/collective control of the means of production? 2 replies → yunohn 8 hours ago Indeed, it’s actually a horrific non-communist pro-capitalist version that leaves citizens much worse off - see “bailout socialism for the rich and rugged individualism for masses”.
fach 15 hours ago Branding nationalizing companies as “citizens control” is quite the spin. Chinese citizens surely own the means of production, right? harimau777 14 hours ago I suppose that depends on whether said country is a democracy where citizens control the government or a dictatorship where they do not. bongodongobob 15 hours ago Nationalizing a company isn't communism and isn't intended to resemble it. sanex 15 hours ago How is that not common/collective control of the means of production? 2 replies → yunohn 8 hours ago Indeed, it’s actually a horrific non-communist pro-capitalist version that leaves citizens much worse off - see “bailout socialism for the rich and rugged individualism for masses”.
harimau777 14 hours ago I suppose that depends on whether said country is a democracy where citizens control the government or a dictatorship where they do not.
bongodongobob 15 hours ago Nationalizing a company isn't communism and isn't intended to resemble it. sanex 15 hours ago How is that not common/collective control of the means of production? 2 replies → yunohn 8 hours ago Indeed, it’s actually a horrific non-communist pro-capitalist version that leaves citizens much worse off - see “bailout socialism for the rich and rugged individualism for masses”.
yunohn 8 hours ago Indeed, it’s actually a horrific non-communist pro-capitalist version that leaves citizens much worse off - see “bailout socialism for the rich and rugged individualism for masses”.
Branding nationalizing companies as “citizens control” is quite the spin. Chinese citizens surely own the means of production, right?
I suppose that depends on whether said country is a democracy where citizens control the government or a dictatorship where they do not.
Nationalizing a company isn't communism and isn't intended to resemble it.
How is that not common/collective control of the means of production?
2 replies →
Indeed, it’s actually a horrific non-communist pro-capitalist version that leaves citizens much worse off - see “bailout socialism for the rich and rugged individualism for masses”.