Comment by sanex 18 hours ago How is that not common/collective control of the means of production? 2 comments sanex Reply thaumasiotes 11 hours ago What would common or collective control mean? If everyone held "control" in common, it wouldn't be possible to do anything.It is possible to nationalize a company, though. For example, Saudi Aramco is owned by the state.How is that not common/collective control of the means of production? sanex 8 hours ago 1. A central government taking ownership of a company in lieu of everyone owning a share. 2. It is.
thaumasiotes 11 hours ago What would common or collective control mean? If everyone held "control" in common, it wouldn't be possible to do anything.It is possible to nationalize a company, though. For example, Saudi Aramco is owned by the state.How is that not common/collective control of the means of production? sanex 8 hours ago 1. A central government taking ownership of a company in lieu of everyone owning a share. 2. It is.
sanex 8 hours ago 1. A central government taking ownership of a company in lieu of everyone owning a share. 2. It is.
What would common or collective control mean? If everyone held "control" in common, it wouldn't be possible to do anything.
It is possible to nationalize a company, though. For example, Saudi Aramco is owned by the state.
How is that not common/collective control of the means of production?
1. A central government taking ownership of a company in lieu of everyone owning a share. 2. It is.