← Back to context Comment by sanex 15 hours ago How is that not common/collective control of the means of production? 2 comments sanex Reply thaumasiotes 8 hours ago What would common or collective control mean? If everyone held "control" in common, it wouldn't be possible to do anything.It is possible to nationalize a company, though. For example, Saudi Aramco is owned by the state.How is that not common/collective control of the means of production? sanex 5 hours ago 1. A central government taking ownership of a company in lieu of everyone owning a share. 2. It is.
thaumasiotes 8 hours ago What would common or collective control mean? If everyone held "control" in common, it wouldn't be possible to do anything.It is possible to nationalize a company, though. For example, Saudi Aramco is owned by the state.How is that not common/collective control of the means of production? sanex 5 hours ago 1. A central government taking ownership of a company in lieu of everyone owning a share. 2. It is.
sanex 5 hours ago 1. A central government taking ownership of a company in lieu of everyone owning a share. 2. It is.
What would common or collective control mean? If everyone held "control" in common, it wouldn't be possible to do anything.
It is possible to nationalize a company, though. For example, Saudi Aramco is owned by the state.
How is that not common/collective control of the means of production?
1. A central government taking ownership of a company in lieu of everyone owning a share. 2. It is.