← Back to context Comment by sanex 1 day ago How is that not common/collective control of the means of production? 2 comments sanex Reply thaumasiotes 16 hours ago What would common or collective control mean? If everyone held "control" in common, it wouldn't be possible to do anything.It is possible to nationalize a company, though. For example, Saudi Aramco is owned by the state.How is that not common/collective control of the means of production? sanex 13 hours ago 1. A central government taking ownership of a company in lieu of everyone owning a share. 2. It is.
thaumasiotes 16 hours ago What would common or collective control mean? If everyone held "control" in common, it wouldn't be possible to do anything.It is possible to nationalize a company, though. For example, Saudi Aramco is owned by the state.How is that not common/collective control of the means of production? sanex 13 hours ago 1. A central government taking ownership of a company in lieu of everyone owning a share. 2. It is.
sanex 13 hours ago 1. A central government taking ownership of a company in lieu of everyone owning a share. 2. It is.
What would common or collective control mean? If everyone held "control" in common, it wouldn't be possible to do anything.
It is possible to nationalize a company, though. For example, Saudi Aramco is owned by the state.
How is that not common/collective control of the means of production?
1. A central government taking ownership of a company in lieu of everyone owning a share. 2. It is.