Comment by thayne

12 hours ago

> For everything else, it’s up to parents or guardians to implement filters, content controls, and blocks.

First of, I'd like to be clear, I don't think laws like this are the right way to go.

But to be fair, even if you are tech literate, which most parents aren't, this is actually pretty difficult to do.

And there are really three approaches you can take to this. You can use an allowlist of sites, but that is very restrictive, and limits the ability to explore, research, and learn how to use the internet generally. You can use a blocklist, but then you will always miss something, and it is a game of whack a mole. Or you can use some kind of AI, but that will probably both block things you don't want blocked, and allow things you do want blocked, and will probably add significant latency.

One possible way this could be improved is if websites with adult or mature content, or potential dangers to children (such as allowing the child to communicate with strangers, or gambling) returned a header that marked the content as possibly not suitable for children with a tag of the reason, and maybe a minimum age. Then a browser or firewall could be configured to block access to anything with headers for undesired content. Although, I think that would be most effective if there were laws requiring the headers to be honest.

> even if you are tech literate, which most parents aren't

18 years ago was 2007! If "most parents" of underage children don't understand the internet, where the hell have they been?

  • By "tech literate" I meant "someone with a solid understanding of technology, who is comfortable installing software and troubleshooting computer problems, and has at least a basic understanding of how computer networks work and how to manage a home lan network". Maybe "tech literate" wasn't the best term.