Comment by hk__2 2 days ago Both, actually. 2 comments hk__2 Reply _aavaa_ 1 day ago It’s entirely independent of focal length.It has to do with the ratio of the subject-camera distance to the background-camera distance.As others have pointed out you prove this to yourself in one of two ways:1. Frame with telephoto, then shoot with a wide angle lens and digitally zoom in photo.2. Frame with wide angle and then shoot a panorama with the telephone and stich.2 is significantly harder if you are close to the subject. rozab 2 days ago Well, no. This article has some clarifications: https://petapixel.com/is-lens-compression-fact-or-fiction/
_aavaa_ 1 day ago It’s entirely independent of focal length.It has to do with the ratio of the subject-camera distance to the background-camera distance.As others have pointed out you prove this to yourself in one of two ways:1. Frame with telephoto, then shoot with a wide angle lens and digitally zoom in photo.2. Frame with wide angle and then shoot a panorama with the telephone and stich.2 is significantly harder if you are close to the subject.
rozab 2 days ago Well, no. This article has some clarifications: https://petapixel.com/is-lens-compression-fact-or-fiction/
It’s entirely independent of focal length.
It has to do with the ratio of the subject-camera distance to the background-camera distance.
As others have pointed out you prove this to yourself in one of two ways:
1. Frame with telephoto, then shoot with a wide angle lens and digitally zoom in photo.
2. Frame with wide angle and then shoot a panorama with the telephone and stich.
2 is significantly harder if you are close to the subject.
Well, no. This article has some clarifications: https://petapixel.com/is-lens-compression-fact-or-fiction/