Comment by nobodywillobsrv

The problem is this kind of long form "thinks" miss the basics and even uses polarising denialist phrases like "fear mongering"

There is a an obvious incoherence and even misreasoning present in the people most ruined by the new media.

For example, you might want to drive the risk of something to zero. To do that, you need to calmly respond with policy every bad event of that type with more restrictions at some cost. This should be uncontentious to describe yet again and again the pattern is to mistake the desires, the costs and the interventions.

I can't even mention examples of this without risking massive karma attacks. That is the state of things.

I used to think misreasoning was just something agit prop accounts did online but years ago started hearing the broken calculus being spoken by IRL humans.

We need a path forward to make people understand they should almost all disagree but they MUST agree on how they disagree else they don't actually disagree.They are just barking animals waiting for a chance to attack.