Comment by kps 7 months ago "status": 451https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7725 5 comments kps Reply dwood_dev 7 months ago I find it interesting that there was no mention of Fahrenheit 451, the very reason they picked that number.They did at least put a thanks to Ray Bradbury. an0malous 7 months ago Seems like they were trying to keep the reference low key, maybe to increase the odds of its acceptance dboreham 7 months ago Same rule applies to any use of 42. AceyMan 7 months ago https://http.cat/451 lemonlearnings 7 months ago Should it be a client error "vote differently" or a server error "this server is not licking the boot" ;)
dwood_dev 7 months ago I find it interesting that there was no mention of Fahrenheit 451, the very reason they picked that number.They did at least put a thanks to Ray Bradbury. an0malous 7 months ago Seems like they were trying to keep the reference low key, maybe to increase the odds of its acceptance dboreham 7 months ago Same rule applies to any use of 42. AceyMan 7 months ago https://http.cat/451 lemonlearnings 7 months ago Should it be a client error "vote differently" or a server error "this server is not licking the boot" ;)
an0malous 7 months ago Seems like they were trying to keep the reference low key, maybe to increase the odds of its acceptance dboreham 7 months ago Same rule applies to any use of 42.
lemonlearnings 7 months ago Should it be a client error "vote differently" or a server error "this server is not licking the boot" ;)
I find it interesting that there was no mention of Fahrenheit 451, the very reason they picked that number.
They did at least put a thanks to Ray Bradbury.
Seems like they were trying to keep the reference low key, maybe to increase the odds of its acceptance
Same rule applies to any use of 42.
https://http.cat/451
Should it be a client error "vote differently" or a server error "this server is not licking the boot" ;)