Comment by sammy2255
7 months ago
How do you "pull out" of the UK if you are not a UK company, you are a US company, hosted in the US, and proxied by Fastly. There's nothing to do? You do not need to abide by UK laws, even if your website is accessible from there.
It means to stop doing business there. For example selling ads targeting UK users to UK advertisers. London banking. Integrating with UK-based data-milking peers.
So if a site doesn't monetise adult content. The UK can't impose fines? Only eventually force ISPs to block that site?
You are sending data into the UK, hence you have to abide by their laws regarding said data.
As the owner of a U.S. based website, I am not sending data anywhere. Some people in the U.K. might request data and download it from my site. I'm not forcing it on them.
You can absolutely take that stance and be fine as long as you never get into the sphere of influence of UK law enforcement for potentially a very long time.
If they get hold of you your interpretation of who sent what doesn't matter but theirs does. They can absolutely hold you until your fine is paid or you spend and equivalent amount of time in prison.
Many people like to vacation in the UK or Europe (one diverted flight away) and they might decide that it's better to just block users and be done with it. Some people may even happily pay a small fine incurred before the block.
HTTP responses (website contents) are data that the web servers you are paying for are sending. People can’t download anything from your site without your servers sending the data. Nothing forces you to send that data when you receive an HTTP request. Indeed, geoblocking is a common way to prevent sending data to jurisdictions whose laws the sending of the data might be in violation of.
4 replies →
or what?
I’m explaining why UK law applies. Prosecution and enforcement are separate topics.
The UK government does not care. The law applies no matter where you are hosted, where you are incorporated or who is proxiying you.
>You do not need to abide by UK laws, even if your website is accessible from there.
The UK government does not agree.
But its still not the UK government's decision. They don't have sovereignty over other nations, as much as they'd like to think they do.
All they can legally do is bitch and moan and order UK ISPs to block. There's no action they can legally take against Imgur.
The US does exert its laws extraterritorially when there is a sufficient nexus to US interests too. Why wouldn't the UK be allowed to do so?
10 replies →
>There's no action they can legally take against Imgur.
This is a very, very dangerous game to play.
This is how employees of your business on vacation in the UK end up in jail.
5 replies →
I suppose in their defense, culturally, the UK hasn't respected many borders apart from their own so this really isn't anything new.
Zing aside, I'd be thrilled to see whatever prosecutor or litigator or whatever they call them over there bring a case against a US based company for hosting content in the US, geoblocking the UK, a UK resident using a VPN to bypass that block, and making the case that that is somehow the US company's fault.
The UK also is trying the same stunt against 4Chan.
The article is from a month ago, but the gears of "justice" rotate slowly: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clyjq40vjl7o
One thing to note is that UK government officials also seem to be masquerading and submitting reports to try to ToS these websites.
1 reply →
> I suppose in their defense, culturally, the UK hasn't respected many borders apart from their own so this really isn't anything new.
Did the US respect the borders of Hawaii?
2 replies →