Comment by zahlman
5 days ago
> You left out the fact that you can’t post to /r/conservative until
You present this as if it were somehow evidence that somehow justifies the bans from the other unrelated subs.
There is no morally justifiable reason why having mainstream conservative viewpoints (which is to say, ones held by a very large fraction of the general populace) should bar someone from non-political participation in non-political subreddits.
The bans in fact are another symptom of the same cause: every kind of right-wing enclave on Reddit gets trolled constantly. The generally left-wing userbase does whatever they can to ostracize right-wingers, or perceived right-wingers. Which includes both banning them from other spaces, and mocking them in their own.
> It’s a moderator-curated echo chamber.
This describes every vaguely political or ideological themed subreddit. Except maybe the general r/politics, which might still be "letting the votes decide" if you don't have the "acceptable" views on every issue. I have literally seen subreddits that would ban people for "ableism" for using the word "stupid" to describe an idea or proposal. And that was like a decade ago and it was getting clearly worse year after year.
>There is no morally justifiable reason why having mainstream conservative viewpoints (which is to say, ones held by a very large fraction of the general populace) should bar someone from non-political participation in non-political subreddits.
Rule 1 of site guidelines includes:
>Communities and users that incite violence or that promote hate based on identity or vulnerability will be banned.
And given the conservaive mindset as of late in the US against trans people and undocumented workers, you can see the issue you run into.
I do disagree with banning off-sub behavior, though. you can use it to tag users and keep a closer eye on them, but moderators moderate their own space, not the entire site.
> And given the conservaive mindset as of late in the US against trans people and undocumented workers
I disagree that they have the beliefs you ascribe to them, broadly speaking. Again, we are talking about the mainstream. Views held by a very large fraction of the general populace.
>I disagree that they have the beliefs you ascribe to them, broadly speaking.
Very well. But their party leader does, and few in the party or even among constituents don't seem to push back on it at all. At the very least, they do not oppose the actions and statements taken and made.
5 replies →