Comment by charcircuit
3 days ago
The goal is to improve life for law abiding citizens. Removing these from society is helping all the people in society. 2 birds with 1 stone.
3 days ago
The goal is to improve life for law abiding citizens. Removing these from society is helping all the people in society. 2 birds with 1 stone.
As long as the society won't decide you are to be removed from the society, too.
At which point I'm sure you will comply and decide to sacrifice yourself for the society, you will, right?
What has happened in your life that you are so devoid of empathy?
I would not be above the law if that's what you are asking.
>so devoid of empathy?
I'm using my empathy to improve the lives of the many people who have to deal with people dying or having their lives ruined by these drugs. Improving the lives of people who have to deal with dysfunctional people on drugs. There are also second order affects that many more people are suffering from.
So you have no issue with "the final solution regarding the jewish question" then? Because that's exactly, what they were doing, they weren't doing anything illegal.
It's not helping the addicts. Nor is it helping the people who don't want to live under a brutally oppressive and cruel regime.
Addicts are a sacrifice I'm willing to make for the greater good of the populace. For how much heroine can ruin people's lives I do not think it is oppressive or cruel to punish people with the loss of a life in perpetuating such a life ruining substance. But it is still helping those people due to the benefits of addicts no longer existing.
Personally I'd be more inclined to sacrifice people advocating cruel, oppressive policies for the greater good if we should consider sacrifice someone, as I consider those attitudes far more harmful.
This is the problem with advocating policies that sacrifices anyone: Someone else will want to sacrifice you
“Some of you may die, but that’s a sacrifice I’m willing to make”