Comment by gigatree
4 months ago
It’s kind of funny how the idea of behavior being a result of breeding goes out the window when it comes to pitbulls. Retrievers naturally retrieve, collies naturally herd, but when a murder-canine eats a family it’s all “oh it could have been any breed”.
it's more nuanced - "pitbull" isn't a single breed, it's a category
none of the dogs in the category were bred to kill indiscriminately - they were expected to obey handlers just like any other working breed
and there are a number of fighting breeds outside of the category as well
Obey handlers to do what?
to not bite people! it's the compact between species that is the reason dogs were allowed to become dogs!
but yes it's a bit irresponsible to allow the proliferation of some strong breeds, breeding should be a serious crime... these dogs are all over the southern us
Lol, murder canine huh? ok, I'll take the bait. Because I'm pretty sure you don't mean a malinois.
Because it could be any breed. There are more significant differences between individual dogs within a breed than between different breeds. Cattle dogs have a reputation for being asocial and "bittey", especially towards ankles, mine would "never" because they have been taught and socialized correctly. Would it be easier to teach him to bite ankles then the average dog? Yes, because hearding breeds have stronger prey drives than companions breeds. But I could teach a retriever to herd too. People with animals to heard buy hearding breeds because they want to herd, will every individual dog from a hearding breed be a good herding dog? No same with service animals, many wash out. Now here's the rub, and why everyone paying attention says it's not about the breed... Antisocial people buy a breed because they want it's reported antisocial characteristics. These people don't train their dog, and.... it's a dog! It's natural instincts are more violent, and it's stronger and better at inflicting injury, dogs hunt.
I suspect you're applying reason incorrectly here because you have some preexisting bias against some dogs in a shape you have an aversion to. Small dogs are much more likely to bite and cause injuries, but you don't care about them as much do you?
Lets try vehicles instead. someone gets drunk, and run over a kid on a motorcycle, They probably don't die right? Someone else gets drunk and runs over a kid in a range rover. They probably do die right? Is it the vehicle? Or is the real problem the person operating the vehicle? Range rovers are the problem here right? No?
Are some breeds stronger and more able to cause harm? Yes, but you don't blame the wood chipper when someone loses their arm in it. You equally don't blame the law mower even though in only takes a finger instead of an arm.
All dogs are pack animals, (just like humans). If a golden retriever owned by a violent person is more dangerous than rottweiler owned by kind loving person, why are you still blaming the breed of the dog instead of the pack it was raised by?
It’s just wokery innit. Can’t even train dogs to murder children nowadays because the woke brigade will cancel you.