Comment by eqvinox

8 hours ago

Nothing in this article is new, and the problem with RTK has always been the (unpaid) availability of reference stations. Good on them for trying to make a package of it, but maybe this "news" site could've used a bit less unchecked enthusiasm.

Also, RTK is the opposite of "regular" GPS, it's generally considered a "special" usage mode of GPS.

And discussing urban canyons with no mention of QZSS?

7 comments

eqvinox

Reply
tecleandor  6 hours ago

Fun thing (?), I was excited on my last trip to Japan so I could test QZSS with my Pixel 9a, that supports it, and my GPS experience in urban canyons, specially in Shibuya, was terribly bad.

Even when in GPS Test or GPS Lock tools it was showing better than 3 meter horizontal accuracy, and a multitude of locked satellites, including some QZSS, the location would usually be 30 to 50 meters away. The first days I though I had lost all my capacity to navigate Tokyo, then I noticed the GPS was gas-lightning me.

I tried removing the phone case, changing GPS settings... and I had no luck.

  • jlack  6 minutes ago

    Extra satellites only have the potential to help a little bit in urban environments by increasing the odds of having a satellite directly overhead. Dense urban environments will have high multipath(longer time for signal to get to the receiver due to bouncing off buildings) which causes the position to be inaccurate.

leecb  5 hours ago

> The Quasi-Zenith Satellite System (QZSS) (Japanese: 準天頂衛星システム, Hepburn: juntenchō eisei shisutemu), also known as Michibiki (みちびき, "guidance"), is a regional navigation satellite system (RNSS) and a satellite-based augmentation system (SBAS) developed by the Japanese government to enhance the United States-operated Global Positioning System (GPS) in the Asia-Oceania regions, with a focus on Japan.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasi-Zenith_Satellite_System

mapt  3 hours ago

Can we agree that with close to 10,000 Starlink birds in the air and counting, that whatever succeeds GPS needs to be a much larger constellation than the 30-unit GPS constellation in MEO, flying much lower?

It is absolutely insane to me that Japan would be trying to economize using Molniya orbits or geosynchronous orbits in 2025.

Some BOTE math:

There are ~40k square degrees in a sphere. If I'm in a dead-end alley in an urban canyon and I have access to a 40 degree by 100 degree viewshed of sky (~4000 square degrees), that's 10% of the sky. Surface area of a 900km sphere is ~10 million square kilometers, 10% of that is 1 million square kilometers, Earth's radius is ~6400km, the orbital radius at 1000km is ~7400km, surface area of a 7400km radius sphere is ~700 million square kilometers, 1 million / 700 million ~= 1/700. Fly 3500 birds and you'll on average see five of them at a time in a 40 by 100 degree viewshed. But you'll have such a large angular parallax between their positions, and so little of the ionosphere in the way, that you get extremely high accuracy.

...

Many countries have their own SBAS to correct for ionospheric ephemera using a combination of regional ground stations and low flying satellites - The US calls their WAAS, Europe uses EGNOS, Japan uses MSAS, Russia and China have versions for their respective constellations, etc.

QZSS is a related but distinct idea that poses a little more like a localized addition to the GPS constellation.