Comment by polar8 10 hours ago The plow was a 10x productivity booster. Guess what happened next? 3 comments polar8 Reply array_key_first 3 hours ago The main difference is that a plow cannot replace a human because a plow is a machine operated by a human.The premise of AI is that it replaces humans.Even if AI creates, say, 200 million new jobs - you would just fill those jobs with AI. Why would you fill them with humans? That's stupid. xutopia 2 hours ago While there will be spots where a human will be replaced by AI there won't be nearly as much as people think over the next decade. ljlolel 7 hours ago 10X population?
array_key_first 3 hours ago The main difference is that a plow cannot replace a human because a plow is a machine operated by a human.The premise of AI is that it replaces humans.Even if AI creates, say, 200 million new jobs - you would just fill those jobs with AI. Why would you fill them with humans? That's stupid. xutopia 2 hours ago While there will be spots where a human will be replaced by AI there won't be nearly as much as people think over the next decade.
xutopia 2 hours ago While there will be spots where a human will be replaced by AI there won't be nearly as much as people think over the next decade.
The main difference is that a plow cannot replace a human because a plow is a machine operated by a human.
The premise of AI is that it replaces humans.
Even if AI creates, say, 200 million new jobs - you would just fill those jobs with AI. Why would you fill them with humans? That's stupid.
While there will be spots where a human will be replaced by AI there won't be nearly as much as people think over the next decade.
10X population?