Comment by glimshe 3 months ago Yes, but the algorithm isn't that great... That's what I'm using now 6 comments glimshe Reply snvzz 3 months ago "Positional" is a single, relatively boring hardcoded pattern, and the other options are Floyd–Steinberg error diffusion.I do agree it would be nice to extend gimp to do all sorts of fancy dithering, and imagine it's just that nobody has put on the work yet. kragen 3 months ago Floyd–Steinberg is pretty great when your palette has reasonably-close colors. snvzz 3 months ago In my own experience playing with dithering, generating a palette is often harder than the dithering itself. 3 replies →
snvzz 3 months ago "Positional" is a single, relatively boring hardcoded pattern, and the other options are Floyd–Steinberg error diffusion.I do agree it would be nice to extend gimp to do all sorts of fancy dithering, and imagine it's just that nobody has put on the work yet. kragen 3 months ago Floyd–Steinberg is pretty great when your palette has reasonably-close colors. snvzz 3 months ago In my own experience playing with dithering, generating a palette is often harder than the dithering itself. 3 replies →
kragen 3 months ago Floyd–Steinberg is pretty great when your palette has reasonably-close colors. snvzz 3 months ago In my own experience playing with dithering, generating a palette is often harder than the dithering itself. 3 replies →
snvzz 3 months ago In my own experience playing with dithering, generating a palette is often harder than the dithering itself. 3 replies →
"Positional" is a single, relatively boring hardcoded pattern, and the other options are Floyd–Steinberg error diffusion.
I do agree it would be nice to extend gimp to do all sorts of fancy dithering, and imagine it's just that nobody has put on the work yet.
Floyd–Steinberg is pretty great when your palette has reasonably-close colors.
In my own experience playing with dithering, generating a palette is often harder than the dithering itself.
3 replies →