Comment by mbrock 6 days ago What does that have to do with apt? 10 comments mbrock Reply dontlaugh 6 days ago Enough of it is performance sensitive that Fil-C is not an option.Fil-C is useful for the long tail of C/C++ that no one will bother to rewrite and is still usable if slow. procaryote 6 days ago How is apt performance sensitive? kragen 6 days ago Apt has been painfully slow since I started using Debian last millennium, but I suspect it's not because it uses a lot of CPU, or it would be snappy by now. dontlaugh 6 days ago It parses formats and does TLS, I’m assuming it’d be quite bad. I don’t think you can mix and match. 6 replies →
dontlaugh 6 days ago Enough of it is performance sensitive that Fil-C is not an option.Fil-C is useful for the long tail of C/C++ that no one will bother to rewrite and is still usable if slow. procaryote 6 days ago How is apt performance sensitive? kragen 6 days ago Apt has been painfully slow since I started using Debian last millennium, but I suspect it's not because it uses a lot of CPU, or it would be snappy by now. dontlaugh 6 days ago It parses formats and does TLS, I’m assuming it’d be quite bad. I don’t think you can mix and match. 6 replies →
procaryote 6 days ago How is apt performance sensitive? kragen 6 days ago Apt has been painfully slow since I started using Debian last millennium, but I suspect it's not because it uses a lot of CPU, or it would be snappy by now. dontlaugh 6 days ago It parses formats and does TLS, I’m assuming it’d be quite bad. I don’t think you can mix and match. 6 replies →
kragen 6 days ago Apt has been painfully slow since I started using Debian last millennium, but I suspect it's not because it uses a lot of CPU, or it would be snappy by now.
dontlaugh 6 days ago It parses formats and does TLS, I’m assuming it’d be quite bad. I don’t think you can mix and match. 6 replies →
Enough of it is performance sensitive that Fil-C is not an option.
Fil-C is useful for the long tail of C/C++ that no one will bother to rewrite and is still usable if slow.
How is apt performance sensitive?
Apt has been painfully slow since I started using Debian last millennium, but I suspect it's not because it uses a lot of CPU, or it would be snappy by now.
It parses formats and does TLS, I’m assuming it’d be quite bad. I don’t think you can mix and match.
6 replies →