Comment by mariusor
4 months ago
I repeat "the work" is to make a better thing than Anubis, not provide proof of concept that it can be beaten. :)
4 months ago
I repeat "the work" is to make a better thing than Anubis, not provide proof of concept that it can be beaten. :)
You criticized what you identified as an "advice" for not providing work to your scope (which you clarified as "make a better thing than Anubis"), why should I suddenly have to meet your scope of "work" to be a valid criticism of your advice this time? Showing a negative result is also work.
If you're operating your reasoning in a moral framework where helping the bad agents is a good outcome, then you'd be right. I personally do not, however.
If your moral framework is supporting a nominally good "solution" with no evidence (where if your evidence that your assertion the solution is "proven"?) is "a good outcome", pointing out the solution is flawed, with evidence, is somehow not, then you'd be right. I personally do not share your nominal goodness compass, however.
2 replies →