Comment by pjmlp 3 months ago Hardly, see programming languages standards and compiler specific extensions. 3 comments pjmlp Reply aDyslecticCrow 3 months ago languages are more fluid than processor architectures. I don't think they can be compared. pjmlp 3 months ago One would think, yet welcome to enterprise consulting, especially customers whose main business is not selling software.You will find fossilized languages all over the place. aDyslecticCrow 3 months ago fossilised is often desirable or requested in some industries. Developing for the embedded market myself, we often have to stick to C99 to ensure compatibility with whatever ancient compiler a costumer or even chipset vendor may still be running.
aDyslecticCrow 3 months ago languages are more fluid than processor architectures. I don't think they can be compared. pjmlp 3 months ago One would think, yet welcome to enterprise consulting, especially customers whose main business is not selling software.You will find fossilized languages all over the place. aDyslecticCrow 3 months ago fossilised is often desirable or requested in some industries. Developing for the embedded market myself, we often have to stick to C99 to ensure compatibility with whatever ancient compiler a costumer or even chipset vendor may still be running.
pjmlp 3 months ago One would think, yet welcome to enterprise consulting, especially customers whose main business is not selling software.You will find fossilized languages all over the place. aDyslecticCrow 3 months ago fossilised is often desirable or requested in some industries. Developing for the embedded market myself, we often have to stick to C99 to ensure compatibility with whatever ancient compiler a costumer or even chipset vendor may still be running.
aDyslecticCrow 3 months ago fossilised is often desirable or requested in some industries. Developing for the embedded market myself, we often have to stick to C99 to ensure compatibility with whatever ancient compiler a costumer or even chipset vendor may still be running.
languages are more fluid than processor architectures. I don't think they can be compared.
One would think, yet welcome to enterprise consulting, especially customers whose main business is not selling software.
You will find fossilized languages all over the place.
fossilised is often desirable or requested in some industries. Developing for the embedded market myself, we often have to stick to C99 to ensure compatibility with whatever ancient compiler a costumer or even chipset vendor may still be running.