Comment by aDyslecticCrow 21 hours ago languages are more fluid than processor architectures. I don't think they can be compared. 2 comments aDyslecticCrow Reply pjmlp 21 hours ago One would think, yet welcome to enterprise consulting, especially customers whose main business is not selling software.You will find fossilized languages all over the place. aDyslecticCrow 18 hours ago fossilised is often desirable or requested in some industries. Developing for the embedded market myself, we often have to stick to C99 to ensure compatibility with whatever ancient compiler a costumer or even chipset vendor may still be running.
pjmlp 21 hours ago One would think, yet welcome to enterprise consulting, especially customers whose main business is not selling software.You will find fossilized languages all over the place. aDyslecticCrow 18 hours ago fossilised is often desirable or requested in some industries. Developing for the embedded market myself, we often have to stick to C99 to ensure compatibility with whatever ancient compiler a costumer or even chipset vendor may still be running.
aDyslecticCrow 18 hours ago fossilised is often desirable or requested in some industries. Developing for the embedded market myself, we often have to stick to C99 to ensure compatibility with whatever ancient compiler a costumer or even chipset vendor may still be running.
One would think, yet welcome to enterprise consulting, especially customers whose main business is not selling software.
You will find fossilized languages all over the place.
fossilised is often desirable or requested in some industries. Developing for the embedded market myself, we often have to stick to C99 to ensure compatibility with whatever ancient compiler a costumer or even chipset vendor may still be running.