← Back to context Comment by aDyslecticCrow 2 days ago languages are more fluid than processor architectures. I don't think they can be compared. 2 comments aDyslecticCrow Reply pjmlp 2 days ago One would think, yet welcome to enterprise consulting, especially customers whose main business is not selling software.You will find fossilized languages all over the place. aDyslecticCrow 2 days ago fossilised is often desirable or requested in some industries. Developing for the embedded market myself, we often have to stick to C99 to ensure compatibility with whatever ancient compiler a costumer or even chipset vendor may still be running.
pjmlp 2 days ago One would think, yet welcome to enterprise consulting, especially customers whose main business is not selling software.You will find fossilized languages all over the place. aDyslecticCrow 2 days ago fossilised is often desirable or requested in some industries. Developing for the embedded market myself, we often have to stick to C99 to ensure compatibility with whatever ancient compiler a costumer or even chipset vendor may still be running.
aDyslecticCrow 2 days ago fossilised is often desirable or requested in some industries. Developing for the embedded market myself, we often have to stick to C99 to ensure compatibility with whatever ancient compiler a costumer or even chipset vendor may still be running.
One would think, yet welcome to enterprise consulting, especially customers whose main business is not selling software.
You will find fossilized languages all over the place.
fossilised is often desirable or requested in some industries. Developing for the embedded market myself, we often have to stick to C99 to ensure compatibility with whatever ancient compiler a costumer or even chipset vendor may still be running.