Comment by sixothree
10 hours ago
> Redactions are necessary to protect innocent members of the public
If these controls don't exist inside the organization, they shouldn't exist for the public either.
10 hours ago
> Redactions are necessary to protect innocent members of the public
If these controls don't exist inside the organization, they shouldn't exist for the public either.
I think it would generally be a good thing for cops kicking down doors to have working body cameras; the state's monopoly on violence is easily abused, and should be carefully monitored.
But if the cops get the wrong address for their no-knock warrant, kick down my door, and find me jerking off in my bedroom - I would prefer the footage not be made public.
Your best defense against this obvious attempt to obstruct justice is "but my penis may be exposed"? Really?
This community really turned around its stance on transparency and openness in the blink of an eye. It's baffling.
They the controls do exist, just not at the capacity required to do it for literally every single hour of footage recorded by body cameras. Hence why they do respond to requests for specific incidents but not blanket or bulk requests.
If they had to do this for all footage then the police department would likely respond by decreasing field officer counts to reduce footage, as well as shift resources away from law enforcement activities and towards redacting the massive volume of footage.