Comment by consumer451
3 months ago
The surprising thing to me here is that $5.83B was their entire stake, after NVDA had gone up more that 1000% in the the last 5 years.
3 months ago
The surprising thing to me here is that $5.83B was their entire stake, after NVDA had gone up more that 1000% in the the last 5 years.
yeah it made me wonder what all this fuss is about. perhaps im numb to big numbers now. but $6b is a miniscule fraction of NVDA.
My main thought was "how bad is Softbank at their job to have only been in on NVDA for such a paltry sum?"
Really living up their reputation? Or, am I way off-base here? I am just an outside observer and I would love to be educated.
Did it makes sense for Softbank to be in so little on the company "selling shovels" to all their "gold mining" investments?
Or, how down bad is Softbank that it needs to sell its NVDA stake to raise $6B?
1 reply →