Comment by sjs382

3 months ago

> AI slop eventually will get as good as your average blogger. Even now if you put an effort into prompting and context building, you can achieve 100% human like results.

In that case, I don't think I consider it "AI slop"—it's "AI something else". If you think everything generated by AI is slop (I won't argue that point), you don't really need the "slop" descriptor.

9 comments

sjs382

Reply
laacz  3 months ago

Then the fight Kagi is proposing is against bad AI content, not AI content per-se? Then that's very subjective...

  • sjs382  3 months ago

    I don't pretend to speak for them, but I'm OK in principle dealing in non-absolutes.

  • Thrymr  3 months ago

    Explicitly in the article, one of the headings is "AI slop is deceptive or low-value AI-generated content, created to manipulate ranking or attention rather than help the reader."

    So yes, they are proposing marking bad AI content (from the user's perspective), not all AI-generated content.